M PHILIPPE VIGERAL

Publications académiques en France

Articles déposés en accès libre sur l'archive ouverte des universités françaises (HAL) — gage d'activité de recherche en France.

• Low incidence of SARS-CoV-2, risk factors of mortality and the course of illness in the French national cohort of dialysis patients

  2020

  ArticleKidney International

Source : HAL — archive ouverte CCSD/CNRS (couvre articles, chapitres EMC, communications congrès, thèses).

Lieu de consultation

Tarifs & secteur de conventionnement

Secteur de conventionnement non disponible (médecin hospitalier ou non présent dans l'Annuaire santé CNAM des libéraux conventionnés).

Prendre rendez-vous & contact

Lien Doctolib = recherche Google site:doctolib.fr (le 1er résultat est presque toujours le profil correct s'il existe).

Top publications · les plus citées

• 1

  Evaluation of post-puncture bleeding time of arteriovenous fistulas with IRIS® bandage

  The journal of vascular access · 2014

  📚 10 citations🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

  Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

  Purpose Our aim was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the IRIS® bandage (Nephrokit®) on post-puncture bleeding compared to conventional manual compression. Methods Sixty-four patients, hemodialyzed with an arteriovenous fistula, were enrolled in a 3-week prospective study. Conventional manual compression was used during the first week, the IRIS® bandage during the second week and conventional manual compression again during the third week. The outcomes analyzed were the persistence or absence of bleeding 3 minutes post-puncture with IRIS® device compared to conventional manual compression. The safety of the IRIS® bandage was also evaluated. Results Rates of persistent bleeding 3 minutes post-puncture at arterial sites were 53±6% and 56±5%, respectively, during the first and third weeks (conventional compression) versus 18±5% during the second week (IRIS® bandage). Similarly, rates of persistent bleeding 3 minutes post-puncture at venous sites were 45±6% and 45±6%, respectively, with conventional compression versus 23±5% with the IRIS® bandage. The difference between the IRIS® device and conventional compression therefore proved highly statistically significant (p<0.05) for both arterial and venous puncture sites. No particular adverse events were observed with the IRIS® device. Conclusions Post-puncture bleeding time at arteriovenous fistula sites is significantly shortened by the IRIS® bandage in comparison with conventional manual compression.

Publications scientifiques (3) — classées par pathologie

Source PubMed · Recherche par auteur (homonymes possibles, vérifier l'affiliation).

Partager cette fiche