Chargement de la fiche…
Chargement de la fiche…
MonRhumato.fr utilise des cookies pour mesurer l'audience (statistiques) et améliorer le site. Aucune donnée de santé identifiable n'est jamais collectée. Politique de confidentialité.
Votre choix est conservé 13 mois (durée max CNIL). Vous pouvez le modifier à tout moment via Préférences cookies.
2 raisons identifiées
Praticien-chercheur
18 articles scientifiques publiés — formation continue solide
Délais de RDV courts dans la région
336.2 rhumatos / 100 000 hab. — département bien doté
✨ Génération du profil synthétique IA en cours…
Indicateurs publics agrégés sur 250 M+ d'œuvres scientifiques (OpenAlex, PubMed). Traduits ici en langage patient.
Influence scientifique
Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.
6
6 articles ont été cités au moins 6fois par d'autres chercheurs — preuve que ses travaux sont repris par la communauté médicale.
h-index
Total citations reçues
427
Nombre de fois où d'autres équipes ont mentionné ses publications dans leurs propres travaux.
Publications totales
21
Articles, revues et chapitres référencés dans les bases académiques internationales.
Articles influents
5
Publications ayant marqué leur domaine — chacune citée au moins 10 fois par d'autres chercheurs.
i10-index
Thématiques principales
Source : OpenAlex (CC0, OurResearch). Indicateurs académiques agrégés sur 250 M+ d'œuvres.
Articles déposés en accès libre sur l'archive ouverte des universités françaises (HAL) — gage d'activité de recherche en France.
Source : HAL — archive ouverte CCSD/CNRS (couvre articles, chapitres EMC, communications congrès, thèses).
CABINET DU DR FREDERIC MAYER
23 RUE DU LAOS, 75015 PARIS
Secteur de conventionnement non disponible (médecin hospitalier ou non présent dans l'Annuaire santé CNAM des libéraux conventionnés).
Lien Doctolib = recherche Google site:doctolib.fr (le 1er résultat est presque toujours le profil correct s'il existe).
Journal of food science · 2010
ABSTRACT: Carotenoids are C‐40 tetraterpenoid compounds with potential health beneficial effects. Major dietary sources include a variety of fruits and vegetables. Rapid screening methods are therefore desired, but their accuracy varies depending on the carotenoid profile and the matrix of the plant food. In the present study, 3 different methods were compared, all based on a rapid extraction protocol and spectrophotometric measurements to determine the total amount carotenoids present in fruits and vegetables ( n = 28), either with or without chlorophyll. Published methods (a) Lichtenthaler and (b) Hornero‐Méndez and Mínguez‐Mosquera were compared with a newly developed method (method c) based on the average molar absorption coefficient (135310 Lcm −1 mol −1 ) and wavelength (450 nm in acetone), for the 5 predominant carotenoid species (beta‐carotene, zeaxanthin, lycopene, lutein, beta‐cryptoxanthin) in the investigated foods. All results were compared to HPLC (method d). To avoid overestimating carotenoid concentrations due to chlorophyll A and B presence, the effect of saponification was studied for all methods. Overall, saponification led to significant carotenoid losses (12.6 ± 0.9%). Methods a, b, c, and d yielded 5.1 ± 0.4 mg/100 g, 4.6 ± 0.5 mg/100 g, 4.3 ± 0.5 mg/100 g, and 4.2 ± 0.5 mg/100 g total carotenoids, respectively, with method a leading to significant higher mean concentrations compared to all other methods ( P < 0.001, Bonferroni) with methods b and c being not significantly different and highly correlated compared to HPLC (> r = 0.95). Similar results were found when stratifying for chlorophyll content and fruits compared with vegetables, however, accuracy varied for individual fruits, highlighting the limitation to use the same method for all plant foods. Practical Application: This study presents a comparison of various rapid spectrophotometric measurements to determine total carotenoid content in various fruits and vegetables and could aid in the selection of the appropriate method for individual plant foods with different carotenoid profile and matrices.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume · 2000
Our aim was to determine the precision of the measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the proximal femur before and after implantation of an uncemented implant, with particular regard to the significance of retro- and prospective studies. We examined 60 patients to determine the difference in preoperative BMD between osteoarthritic and healthy hips. The results showed a preoperative BMD of the affected hip which was lower by a mean of 4% and by a maximum of 9% compared with the opposite side. In addition, measurements were made in the operated hip before and at ten days after operation to determine the effect of the implantation of an uncemented custom-made femoral stem. The mean increase in the BMD was 8% and the maximum was 24%. Previous retrospective studies have reported a marked loss of BMD on the operated side. The precision of double measurements using a special foot jig showed a modified coefficient of variation of 0.6% for the non-operated side in 15 patients and of 0.6% for the operated femur in 20 patients. The effect of rotation on the precision of the measurements after implantation of an uncemented femoral stem was determined in ten explanted femora and for the operated side in ten patients at 10° rotation and in 20 patients at 30° rotation. Rotation within 30° influenced the precision in studies in vivo and in vitro by a mean of 3% and in single cases in up to 60%. Precise prediction of the degree of loss of BMD is thus only possible in prospective cross-sectional measurements, since the effect of the difference in preoperative BMD, as well as the apparent increase in BMD after implantation of an uncemented stem, is not known from retrospective studies. The DEXA method is a reliable procedure for determining periprosthetic BMD when positioning and rotation are strictly controlled.
Source PubMed · Recherche par auteur (homonymes possibles, vérifier l'affiliation).
Pharmacological research · 2026 · Journal Article
Spini A, L'Abbate L, Ingrasciotta Y, Carollo M, et al.
Disability and rehabilitation · 2022 · Journal Article
Lin CI, Mayer F, Wippert PM
Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2020 · Journal Article
Weber MN, Mosena ACS, da Silva MS, Canova R, et al.
Virology · 2018 · Journal Article
Weber MN, Cibulski SP, Olegário JC, da Silva MS, et al.
Bioresource technology · 2014 · Comparative Study
Mayer F, Gerin PA, Noo A, Lemaigre S, et al.
Journal of food science · 2010 · Journal Article
Biehler E, Mayer F, Hoffmann L, Krause E, et al.
MMW Fortschritte der Medizin · 2004 · English Abstract
Mayer F, Baur H, Müller S, Hirschmüller A, et al.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume · 2000 · Comparative Study
Martini F, Lebherz C, Mayer F, Leichtle U, et al.
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2000 · Clinical Trial
Horstmann T, Mayer F, Heitkamp HC, Merk J, et al.
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 1999 · English Abstract
Martini F, Tröndle S, Sell S, Mayer F, et al.
Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 1992 · Case Reports
Hannequin JR, Doffoël M, Imler M, Schmutz G, et al.
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 1985 · Comparative Study
Partsch G, Schwarzer C, Dunky A, Mayer F, et al.
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 1983 · English Abstract
Neumüller J, Senautka G, Dunky A, Neumann H, et al.
International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2006 · Case Reports
Weyrich P, Borgmann S, Mayer F, Heeg P, et al.
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 1984 · Case Reports
Lindlbauer R, Schwarz T, Mayer F, Gschnait F
BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2022 · Journal Article
Lin CI, Mayer F, Wippert PM
Trials · 2017 · Journal Article
Eichler S, Rabe S, Salzwedel A, Müller S, et al.
American journal of diseases of children (1960) · 1963 · Journal Article
MAYER FE, DOYLE EF, HERRERA L, BROWNELL KD
Trials · 2017 · Journal Article
Eichler S, Rabe S, Salzwedel A, Müller S, et al.