Docteur Anna LUDIG-LESCINSKY

Rhumatologue

📍 Strasbourg (67)LibéralRPPS 10002393030

✨ Profil synthétique

IA · 11/05/2026

Le Docteur Anna LUDIG-LESCINSKY est une rhumatologue exerçant à Strasbourg en libéral. Ses publications sur PubMed couvrent divers aspects de la rhumatologie, notamment les biothérapies non-anti-TNF et les biomarqueurs. Elle a également publié des études de cas et des revues générales sur le sujet.

Expertises présumées

Biothérapies non-anti-TNF
Biomarqueurs
Rhumatologie pédiatrique
Auto-anticorps
Revue systématique
Méta-analyse
Études de cas en rhumatologie

Synthèse automatique à partir des sources publiques (HAL, OpenAlex, theses.fr, ClinicalTrials.gov, FAI²R, ANS). Pas une évaluation clinique. Le médecin peut corriger via son compte.

✨ Génération du profil synthétique IA en cours…

Diplômes

🎓 DES & spécialité ordinale

DES Rhumatologie
Rhumatologie (SM)

🎓 Diplômes

DE Docteur en médecine

Source : Annuaire Santé ANS (FHIR Practitioner.qualification) · Mises à jour quotidiennes.

Lieux de consultation(2)

Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.

Top publications · les plus citées

The Reported Evidence of Nursing and Midwifery Mentorship Programmes Internationally: A Scoping Meta-Review Providing a Comprehensive Overview of Mentorship Programmes

Journal of advanced nursing · 2026

📚 6 citations🎯 RCR 6.00🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

ABSTRACT Aim To synthesise and critically analyse existing reviews of evidence on mentorship in nursing and midwifery, providing a comprehensive overview of current knowledge. Design A scoping meta‐review. Methods The review was conducted using the scoping meta‐review framework outlined by Sarrami‐Foroushani et al. (2015), alongside the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines to ensure rigour and transparency. The following steps were included: (i) defining the problem, (ii) literature search and criteria, (iii) study selection and data extraction, (iv) data synthesis, (v) presentation of results and (vi) interpretation and recommendations. Data Sources A comprehensive search strategy was designed, utilising Boolean operators, truncation and predefined keywords across seven databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Epistemonikos, ERIC and Google Scholar. Results Following double‐blind screening of 269 papers, 14 literature reviews were included. The findings provided a detailed overview of mentorship programme types (formal and informal), outcome measures used to evaluate mentorship effectiveness and recommendations for future programmes. Identified themes included skill development, job satisfaction, career progression and retention outcomes, together with challenges including time constraints and balancing clinical responsibilities with mentorship roles. Formal mentorship programmes that are adequately supported and integrated into the organisational culture can improve healthcare systems, workforce stability and patient outcomes. Informal mentorship continues to offer valuable, flexible support, particularly when used alongside formal structures. Implementation challenges exist, such as time constraints, limited organisational support, and mismatched mentor‐mentee pairings. Conclusion This review highlights the critical role of mentorship in nursing and midwifery, offering insights into effective practices, challenges and potential areas for further research. The findings suggest that formal, structured mentorship programmes produce consistent benefits, including enhanced clinical skills, confidence and satisfaction among mentees, as well as leadership development and professional fulfilment for mentors, while positively impacting organisational efficiency and patient outcomes. Successful mentorship programmes require organisational commitment, with protected time, resources, and ongoing mentor training. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care Mentorship programmes in nursing and midwifery enhance professional development, job satisfaction, and retention, enabling a stable healthcare workforce. Mentorship for mentors and mentees is linked to increased confidence, competency and readiness for advanced roles among nurses and midwives. Fostering mentorship in healthcare can lead to improved quality and continuity of care as mentees grow into more competent and confident practitioners. Impact Formal mentorship programmes that are adequately supported and integrated into the organisational culture can improve healthcare systems, workforce stability and patient outcomes. Policymakers responsible for healthcare workforce development can use these findings to advocate for mentorship as a strategic investment, potentially influencing policies related to nurse retention, professional development and funding allocations for mentorship initiatives. Structured mentorship improves job satisfaction, reduces turnover and fosters professional growth, thus reducing costs associated with recruitment and training. Reporting Method The findings are reported in line with the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al., 2021) and through a narrative synthesis, summarising and analysing the results of various reviews to present a cohesive understanding of mentorship practices in nursing and midwifery. This method allowed for the integration of qualitative and quantitative findings and the identification of common themes and patterns across studies. Patient or Public Contribution Patients or members of the public did not directly contribute to this review. However, by focusing on mentorship practices that support nurses and midwives, the study indirectly addresses public interests, as improved mentoring contributes to the quality of patient care. Future studies could benefit from patient or public feedback on desired qualities in care providers, further informing the development of mentorship programmes aligned with patient‐centred care outcomes.

Telehomecare as a Catalyst for a Multifaceted Transformation Towards Sustainable Practices: A Qualitative Study From a Practical Nurses' Perspective

Journal of advanced nursing · 2026

📚 3 citations🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

ABSTRACT Aim(s) To explore how practical nurses perceive telehomecare in relation to sustainability. Design This study had a qualitative exploratory design. Methods Ten practical nurses working with telehomecare were interviewed in February–April 2024. The interviews were individual, semi‐structured and were analysed through Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Results The overarching theme of this study was ‘Telehomecare: A catalyst for a multifaceted transformation towards sustainable practices in homecare nursing’, with three main themes and seven subthemes. The three main themes were ‘Reshaped delivery of care’, ‘Reformed work environment’ and ‘Reallocated resources'. The findings reveal that nurses have multifaceted perspectives on telehomecare in relation to sustainability, recognising both its positive and negative impacts on healthcare organisations, nurses and clients while also acknowledging that more sustainable practices demand significant changes in the healthcare environment. Conclusion Telehomecare has significant impacts on multiple dimensions of sustainability within healthcare and notable drawbacks. These findings emphasise the critical need for comprehensive education and training in sustainable digital work practices to enhance healthcare professionals' awareness of environmental impacts. This underscores the importance of transformative leadership that drives organisational change towards sustainable healthcare practices and implements effective sustainability policies. Impact The findings present some aspects of telehomecare that contribute to a lesser environmental impact from a nursing care perspective, encouraging healthcare leaders to make conscious and effective strategic decisions towards more sustainable healthcare. The findings strengthen nurses, leaders and policymakers' knowledge and awareness of sustainable nursing activities in the digital milieu, highlighting the urgent need for transformation of healthcare practices to decrease the environmental impact. Reporting Method The study followed the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ). Patient or Public Contribution This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.

Emergent Carotid Stenting for Acute Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke With Tandem Lesions: The Multicenter CERES-TANDEM Study

Neurology · 2026

📚 2 citations🩺 Clinique

Cookies & analyse de trafic

Docteur Anna LUDIG-LESCINSKY

Pourquoi vous devez consulter ce praticien

Diplômes

Lieux de consultation(2)

Tarifs & secteur de conventionnement

Prendre rendez-vous & contact

Top publications · les plus citées

Publications scientifiques (50) — classées par pathologie

Transversal34

Revue générale7

Revue / méta-analyse3

Biothérapies non-anti-TNF2

Pédiatrie2

Biomarqueurs / Auto-Ac1

Case report / série1

Économie santé1

Génétique1

IRM ostéo-articulaire1

Partager cette fiche