Aller au contenu principal
Retour à l'annuaire
RhumatologueMédecins généralistes et spécialistes👤 Libéral intégral

Mme Docteur Vanina NICOL

📍 Neuilly-sur-Seine (92)Mixte💶 Secteur 2RPPS 10101127479
📚 HAL (1)🏆 1 DU/DIU

Diplômes

🎓 DES & spécialité ordinale

  • DES Rhumatologie
  • Rhumatologie (SM)

🏅 DU / DIU

  • DIU Etudes approfondies polyarthrites-maladies

🎓 Diplômes

  • DE Docteur en médecine

Source : Annuaire Santé ANS (FHIR Practitioner.qualification) · Mises à jour quotidiennes.

Bibliographie

Source : HAL — archive ouverte CCSD/CNRS (couvre articles, chapitres EMC, communications congrès, thèses).

Localisation

Adresses géocodées via la Base Adresse Nationale (api-adresse.data.gouv.fr). Précision indicative.

Lieux de consultation

Tarifs & secteur de conventionnement

🟡 Secteur 2 — Honoraires libresSource CNAM (Annuaire santé Ameli)
💳 Carte VitaleLibéral intégral

Prendre rendez-vous & contact

Lien Doctolib = recherche Google site:doctolib.fr (le 1er résultat est presque toujours le profil correct s'il existe).

Top publications · les plus citées

  • 1
    Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review of Recent International Guidelines for Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment

    Journal of clinical medicine · 2023

    📚 126 citations🎯 RCR 35.14Top 0% NIH🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗
    Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

    Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a public and occupational health problem that is a major professional, economic and social burden. We aimed to provide a critical overview of current international recommendations regarding the management of non-specific cLBP. We conducted a narrative review of international guidelines for the diagnosis and conservative treatment of people with non-specific cLBP. Our literature search yielded five reviews of guidelines published between 2018 and 2021. In these five reviews, we identified eight international guidelines that fulfilled our selection criteria. We added the 2021 French guidelines into our analysis. Regarding diagnosis, most international guidelines recommend searching for so-called yellow, blue and black flags, in order to stratify the risk of chronicity and/or persistent disability. The relevance of clinical examination and imaging are under debate. Regarding management, most international guidelines recommend non-pharmacological treatments, including exercise therapy, physical activity, physiotherapy and education; however, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, in selected cases, is the core treatment recommended for people with non-specific cLBP. Oral, topical or injected pharmacological treatments are under debate, and may be offered to selected and well-phenotyped patients. The diagnosis of people with cLBP may lack precision. All guidelines recommend multimodal management. In clinical practice, the management of individuals with non-specific cLBP should combine non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments. Future research should focus on improving tailorization.

  • 2
    Barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis: a single-centred mixed-method feasibility study

    BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023

    📚 3 citations🎯 RCR 1.17🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗
    Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

    Abstract Background Conservative treatments including bracing and exercise therapy are prescribed on the first-line in adults with degenerative scoliosis. However, adherence to conservative treatments is low. We aimed to assess barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis. Methods We conducted a single-centred mixed-method pilot and feasibility study. All patients scheduled for a multidisciplinary custom-made bracing consultation, from July 2019 to January 2020, in a French tertiary care centre, were screened. Patients were eligible if they had painful adult degenerative scoliosis and a prescription for a rigid custom-made lumbar-sacral orthosis. The primary outcome was barriers and facilitators to bracing assessed by a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews. Secondary outcomes were back pain, spine-specific activity limitations, symptoms of depression and satisfaction with bracing post-intervention assessed by a quantitative approach. Results Overall, 56 patients were screened and 14 (25%) were included. Mean age was 68.2 (12.3) years. Mean follow-up was 9.8 (2.0) months. Barriers to bracing were increased limitations in some activities, discomfort in hot weather and burden of aesthetic appearance. Facilitators to bracing were reduced pain, improved activities of daily living, suitable weight and improved spinal alignment. Participants self-implemented solutions to enhance adherence. The mean reduction from baseline in pain intensity was 1.7 (2.3) of 10 points, and 6 of 13 patients (46%) had pain intensity < 4 of 10 points. Conclusion Bracing is a feasible intervention for people with painful adult degenerative scoliosis. Patients self-implemented their own solutions to enhance adherence.

Publications scientifiques (2) — classées par pathologie

Source PubMed · Recherche par auteur (homonymes possibles, vérifier l'affiliation).

Lombalgie1

Transversal1

Datasets & protocoles partagés

Source : DataCite — DOIs pour datasets, logiciels, protocoles, registres patient. Hors articles (déjà couverts).

Partager cette fiche

in LinkedIn🟢 WhatsApp✉ Email

Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.