M. Docteur RALF AGOUNIZERA

Thèses universitaires

• Pathologie du cou et du membre supérieur chez 37 musiciens à cordes frottées ; résultats d'une enquête prospective

  1999
  Médecine🎓 Montpellier 1

  Direction : Jean-Louis Leroux

Source : catalogue national des thèses theses.fr (ABES). Ne couvre que les doctorats / HDR — les thèses d'exercice (DES) sont archivées dans les SCD universitaires.

Localisation des cabinets

Adresses géocodées via la Base Adresse Nationale (api-adresse.data.gouv.fr). Précision indicative.

Lieux de consultation

• CABINET DU DR RALF AGOUNIZERA

  MAISON MEDICALE LES ROSES — 57 ROUTE DE LAVERUNE, 34070 Montpellier

  ☎ 0467425642Libéral
  © OpenStreetMap

  📷 Street View ↗🗺️ Maps ↗OSM ↗

• CABINET DU DR RALF AGOUNIZERA

  3 CHEMIN DU CAMP D ARIES, 34570 Saint-Paul-et-Valmalle

  ☎ 0467425642Libéral
  © OpenStreetMap

  📷 Street View ↗🗺️ Maps ↗OSM ↗

Tarifs & secteur de conventionnement

Prendre rendez-vous & contact

Lien Doctolib = recherche Google site:doctolib.fr (le 1er résultat est presque toujours le profil correct s'il existe).

Top publications · les plus citées

• 1

  Hip abductor strengthening in patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis - a systematic review and meta-analysis

  BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022

  📚 27 citations🎯 RCR 4.34Top 10% NIH🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

  Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

  Abstract Background Globally osteoarthritis of the knee is a leading cause of disability. Hip abductor strength and activation are essential for maintaining postural balance during transfers and are related to joint loading and progression during weight-bearing activities. Strength deficits in the hip abductors might cause a reduction in the lower extremity force generation, thereby causing stress on the medial tibiofemoral joint. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of hip abductor strengthening on knee joint loading, knee pain and functional outcome measures in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Methods Database such as Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database and PEDro were reviewed to recognize the trials published in English from inception to December 2020. Randomized controlled trials that studied the effectiveness of hip abductor strengthening in subjects with knee osteoarthritis and its impact on knee joint loading, knee pain and functional outcome measures were included. RevMan 5.4 was used for meta-analysis and forest plot construction. Quality assessment of the included studies was carried out using the PEDro scale. Results and discussion The search yielded 260 results of which 29 full-text articles were screened. The review includes 7 randomized controlled trials and 3 studies with good methodological quality were included for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the articles favored hip abductor strengthening intervention over the control group. Hip abductor strengthening had significantly reduced the VAS [ SMD = -0.60[-0.88, -0.33] p < 0.0001]at 95% CI and improved the WOMAC scores [SMD – 0.75[-1.05,-0.45] p < 0.0001] at 95% CI. All of the included studies concluded that strengthening the hip abductor muscle had a positive impact on knee pain and functional outcomes. Conclusion The current study found high-quality evidence to support the use of hip abductor muscle strengthening exercises as a rehabilitative treatment for subjects with knee osteoarthritis. Trial registration CRD42021256251.

• 2

  Vaccine hesitancy decreases in rheumatic diseases, long-term concerns remain in myositis: a comparative analysis of the COVAD surveys

  Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023

  📚 18 citations🎯 RCR 2.15Top 25% NIH🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

  Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

  Abstract Objective COVID-19 vaccines have a favorable safety profile in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) such as idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs); however, hesitancy continues to persist among these patients. Therefore, we studied the prevalence, predictors and reasons for hesitancy in patients with IIMs, other AIRDs, non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs) and healthy controls (HCs), using data from the two international COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) e-surveys. Methods The first and second COVAD patient self-reported e-surveys were circulated from March to December 2021, and February to June 2022 (ongoing). We collected data on demographics, comorbidities, COVID-19 infection and vaccination history, reasons for hesitancy, and patient reported outcomes. Predictors of hesitancy were analysed using regression models in different groups. Results We analysed data from 18 882 (COVAD-1) and 7666 (COVAD-2) respondents. Reassuringly, hesitancy decreased from 2021 (16.5%) to 2022 (5.1%) (OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.30, P < 0.001). However, concerns/fear over long-term safety had increased (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 2.9, 4.6, P < 0.01). We noted with concern greater skepticism over vaccine science among patients with IIMs than AIRDs (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.08, 3.2, P = 0.023) and HCs (OR: 4; 95% CI: 1.9, 8.1, P < 0.001), as well as more long-term safety concerns/fear (IIMs vs AIRDs – OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2, 2.9, P = 0.001; IIMs vs HCs – OR: 5.4 95% CI: 3, 9.6, P < 0.001). Caucasians [OR 4.2 (1.7–10.3)] were likely to be more hesitant, while those with better PROMIS physical health score were less hesitant [OR 0.9 (0.8–0.97)]. Conclusion Vaccine hesitancy has decreased from 2021 to 2022, long-term safety concerns remain among patients with IIMs, particularly in Caucasians and those with poor physical function.

• 3

  Prevalence of Oral Submucous Fibrosis With Other Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Clinical Retrospective Study

  Cureus · 2023

  📚 12 citations🎯 RCR 3.65Top 12% NIH🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

Publications scientifiques (50) — classées par pathologie

Source PubMed · Recherche par auteur (homonymes possibles, vérifier l'affiliation).

Partager cette fiche