Chargement de la fiche…
Chargement de la fiche…
MonRhumato.fr utilise des cookies pour mesurer l'audience (statistiques) et améliorer le site. Aucune donnée de santé identifiable n'est jamais collectée. Politique de confidentialité.
Votre choix est conservé 13 mois (durée max CNIL). Vous pouvez le modifier à tout moment via Préférences cookies.
4 raisons identifiées
Plateau technique de référence
Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) — équipements et expertise pointus pour les cas complexes
Praticien-chercheur
5 articles scientifiques publiés — formation continue solide
Disponibilité géographique
2 lieux d'exercice — choisissez celui qui vous arrange
Délais de RDV courts dans la région
144.4 rhumatos / 100 000 hab. — département bien doté
4 publications sur 5 ans
✨ Génération du profil synthétique IA en cours…
Indicateurs publics agrégés sur 250 M+ d'œuvres scientifiques (OpenAlex, PubMed). Traduits ici en langage patient.
Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.
Influence scientifique
5
5 articles ont été cités au moins 5fois par d'autres chercheurs — preuve que ses travaux sont repris par la communauté médicale.
h-index
Total citations reçues
131
Nombre de fois où d'autres équipes ont mentionné ses publications dans leurs propres travaux.
Publications totales
5
Articles, revues et chapitres référencés dans les bases académiques internationales.
Articles influents
2
Publications ayant marqué leur domaine — chacune citée au moins 10 fois par d'autres chercheurs.
i10-index
Thématiques principales
Source : OpenAlex (CC0, OurResearch). Indicateurs académiques agrégés sur 250 M+ d'œuvres.
Articles déposés en accès libre sur l'archive ouverte des universités françaises (HAL) — gage d'activité de recherche en France.
Predictive genomic and transcriptomic analysis on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration materials from primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a prospective multicentre study
2024ArticleEBioMedicine
Identification of protease-sensitive but not misfolding PNLIP variants in familial and hereditary pancreatitis
2023ArticlePancreatology
Risk factors for EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation adverse events in patients with pancreatic neoplasms: a large national French study (RAFPAN study)
2023ArticleGastrointestinal Endoscopy
The PRSS3P2 and TRY7 deletion copy number variant modifies risk for chronic pancreatitis
2022ArticlePancreatology
Early double-guidewire versus repeated single-guidewire technique to facilitate selective bile duct cannulation: a randomized controlled trial
2021ArticleEndoscopy
Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Pancreatic Cancer and Factors Associated With Outcomes
2020ArticleGastroenterology
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas and European guidelines: importance of the surgery type in the decision-making process
2019ArticleBMC Surgery
Complete endoscopic sphincterotomy with vs. without large-balloon dilation for the removal of large bile duct stones: randomized multicenter study
2017ArticleEndoscopy
Source : HAL — archive ouverte CCSD/CNRS (couvre articles, chapitres EMC, communications congrès, thèses).
HOPITAL HAUT-LEVEQUE - CHU
AV DE MAGELLAN, 33604 PESSAC CEDEX
CABINET PRIVE DU DR CLEMENT SUBTIL
GROUPE HOSPITALIER SUD AVENUE DE MAGELLAN, 33604 PESSAC CEDEX
Secteur de conventionnement non disponible (médecin hospitalier ou non présent dans l'Annuaire santé CNAM des libéraux conventionnés).
Lien Doctolib = recherche Google site:doctolib.fr (le 1er résultat est presque toujours le profil correct s'il existe).
Endoscopy · 2014
Endoscopy · 2017
Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation (ES-LBD) has been reported as an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones. This multicenter study compared complete endoscopic sphincterotomy with vs. without large-balloon dilation for the removal of large bile duct stones. This is the first randomized multicenter study to evaluate these procedures in patients with exclusively large common bile duct (CBD) stones. Methods Between 2010 and 2015, 150 patients with one or more common bile duct stones ≥ 13 mm were randomized to two groups: 73 without balloon dilation (conventional group), 77 with balloon dilation (ES-LBD group). Mechanical lithotripsy was subsequently performed only if the stones were too large for removal through the papilla. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was complete in both groups. Patients could switch to ES-LBD if the conventional procedure failed. Results There was no between-group difference in number and size of stones. CBD stone clearance was achieved in 74.0 % of patients in the conventional group and 96.1 % of patients in the ES-LBD group (P < 0.001). Mechanical lithotripsy was needed significantly more often in the conventional group (35.6 % vs. 3.9 %; P < 0.001). There was no difference in terms of morbidity (9.3 % in the conventional group vs. 8.1 % in the ES-LBD group; P = 0.82). The cost and procedure time were not significantly different between the groups overall, but became significantly higher for patients in the conventional group who underwent mechanical lithotripsy. The conventional procedure failed in 19 patients, 15 of whom underwent a rescue ES-LBD procedure that successfully cleared all stones. Conclusions Complete endoscopic sphincterotomy with large-balloon dilation for the removal of large CBD stones has similar safety but superior efficiency to conventional treatment, and should be considered as the first-line step in the treatment of large bile duct stones and in rescue treatment.Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02592811).
Endoscopy · 2022
Abstract Background During endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), access to the common bile duct (CBD) can be problematic after unintentional insertion of the guidewire into the pancreatic duct. We conducted a prospective, randomized study in order to compare biliary cannulation success rates of early double-guidewire (EDG) and repeated single-guidewire (RSG) techniques in patients with inadvertent passage of the guidewire into the pancreatic duct. Methods Patients with a native papilla were randomly assigned to either the EDG or RSG groups after unintentional insertion of the guidewire into the pancreatic duct. The primary outcome was successful selective CBD cannulation within 10 minutes. The secondary outcomes were successful final selective bile duct cannulation, time to bile duct cannulation, and frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Results 142 patients were randomized and selective bile duct cannulation was achieved in 57/68 patients (84 %) in the EDG group and in 37/74 patients (50 %) in the RSG group within 10 minutes (relative risk 1.34; 95 % confidence interval 1.08–6.18; P < 0.001). The overall final selective bile duct cannulation rate was 99.3 %. The time to access the CBD was shorter using the EDG technique (6.0 vs. 10.4 minutes; P = 0.002). Mild PEP was not observed more frequently in the EDG group than in the RSG group. Conclusion The EDG technique significantly increased the success rate of biliary duct cannulation within 10 minutes compared with an RSG approach.
Source PubMed · Recherche par auteur (homonymes possibles, vérifier l'affiliation).
Endoscopy · 2022 · Journal Article
Laquière A, Privat J, Jacques J, Legros R, et al.
Endoscopy · 2017 · Comparative Study
Karsenti D, Coron E, Vanbiervliet G, Privat J, et al.
Endoscopy · 2014 · Journal Article
Vanbiervliet G, Napoléon B, Saint Paul MC, Sakarovitch C, et al.
Pancreas · 2020 · Journal Article
Karsenti D, Caillol F, Chaput U, Perrot B, et al.
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · 2016 · Journal Article
Fron C, Pierry C, Poullenot F, Chabrun E, et al.
Pancreas · 2020 · Journal Article
Karsenti D, Caillol F, Chaput U, Perrot B, et al.