📇 Rhumatologue · ANGERS CEDEX 02 · (49) · Salarié
Chargement de la fiche…
Chargement de la fiche…
MonRhumato.fr utilise des cookies pour mesurer l'audience (statistiques) et améliorer le site. Aucune donnée de santé identifiable n'est jamais collectée. Politique de confidentialité.
Votre choix est conservé 13 mois (durée max CNIL). Vous pouvez le modifier à tout moment via Préférences cookies.
1 raison identifiée
Délais de RDV courts dans la région
121.5 rhumatos / 100 000 hab. — département bien doté
✨ Génération du profil synthétique IA en cours…
Articles déposés en accès libre sur l'archive ouverte des universités françaises (HAL) — gage d'activité de recherche en France.
Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.
Source : HAL — archive ouverte CCSD/CNRS (couvre articles, chapitres EMC, communications congrès, thèses).
ICO - SITE PAUL PAPIN
CENTRE PAUL PAPIN 15 R ANDRE BOCQUEL CS 10059, 49055 ANGERS CEDEX 02
Secteur de conventionnement non disponible (médecin hospitalier ou non présent dans l'Annuaire santé CNAM des libéraux conventionnés).
Lien Doctolib = recherche Google site:doctolib.fr (le 1er résultat est presque toujours le profil correct s'il existe).
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
PURPOSE Multiple studies have demonstrated that electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) improve overall survival and quality of life in cancer care. However, there are no specific prospective data on remote ePRO monitoring in the older population, although they represent a significant proportion of patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS From February 2021 to April 2022, patients age 75 years and older under active anticancer treatment were consecutively recruited in six institutions. Remote ePRO feasibility was determined in intention-to-test (ITT) on the basis of the number of active users in the overall population. Primary failure applied to patients who had no Internet access or declined to test ePROs, while the other patients were assigned to the ITT population. Feasibility was also determined per-protocol on the basis of the number of active patients in the ITT population. RESULTS Of the 473 patients included, primary failure applied to 288 patients (233 of whom had no Internet access). Among the 185 patients in ITT, 122 used ePROs, leading to a 26% feasibility in ITT and a 66% feasibility per protocol. In a multivariate analysis, the intent to test population was from a higher socioprofessional category ( P = .009) and felt in better general condition in the Geriatric 8-score evaluation ( P = .002). Active patients significantly differed from the inactive on their self-assessment of a better general condition ( P < .001) only. CONCLUSION Our multicenter study showed a limited feasibility rate (26%) of remote ePROs monitoring for older patients with cancer, mainly because of technology barriers. Yet, among the patients who did have Internet access, most of them indeed used ePROs (66%). Given the expected benefit of ePROs, the technology barriers therefore need to be lifted to improve cancer care in older patients.
Source PubMed · Recherche par auteur (homonymes possibles, vérifier l'affiliation).
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020 · Journal Article
Jacquin JP, Uwer L, Savignoni A, Ferrero JM, et al.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024 · Journal Article
Cancel M, Sauger C, Biogeau J, Dardaine-Giraud V, et al.