📇 Rhumatologue · LE KREMLIN BICETRE CEDEX · (94) · Hospitalier

M MARTIN DURACINSKY

Pourquoi vous devez consulter ce praticien

3 raisons identifiées

Plateau technique de référence
Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) — équipements et expertise pointus pour les cas complexes
Auteur de référence en rhumatologie
34 articles scientifiques publiés — un praticien à la pointe de la recherche
Délais de RDV courts dans la région
134 rhumatos / 100 000 hab. — département bien doté

Rhumatologue

📍 LE KREMLIN BICETRE CEDEX (94)HospitalierRPPS 10001597003

📊 Reconnaissance scientifique : 22/100📝 184 articles publiés🇫🇷 Publications académiques françaises (8)

✨ Génération du profil synthétique IA en cours…

Activité de recherche & publications

Indicateurs publics agrégés sur 250 M+ d'œuvres scientifiques (OpenAlex, PubMed). Traduits ici en langage patient.

Influence scientifique

Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.

Top publications · les plus citées

A 4-days-on and 3-days-off maintenance treatment strategy for adults with HIV-1 (ANRS 170 QUATUOR): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel, non-inferiority trial

The lancet. HIV · 2022

📚 49 citations🎯 RCR 4.66Top 9% NIH🩺 Clinique

Electronic Tools to Bridge the Language Gap in Health Care for People Who Have Migrated: Systematic Review

Journal of medical Internet research · 2021

📚 31 citations🎯 RCR 3.03Top 16% NIH🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

Background People who have migrated or with a language barrier may face significant hurdles in accessing health care. Some apps have been specifically developed to facilitate the dialogue between health care professionals and people who have migrated who have low-level language proficiency or to promote health among people who have migrated. Objective We conducted a systematic review to investigate development, acceptability, and effectiveness of these types of apps. Methods We conducted a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. We included all study designs (qualitative, quantitative, mixed) reporting development, evaluation of efficacy, or acceptability of apps facilitating dialogue with a health professional or promoting health for people who have migrated, minorities, or tourists with a language barrier, using any outcome. Two researchers selected the studies independently. We collected general information about the app, information about health literacy and cultural adaptation, information about the development of the app, evidence on acceptability or efficacy, and information on app use. Data were collected by 2 researchers independently and results were reviewed to verify agreement and reported according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis). Results Positive results for translation apps included better communication, but with possible limitations, and reduced consultation time. Positive results for health promotion apps included improved quality of life and better management of chronic illnesses. Conclusions Overall, the apps had good levels of acceptability, though only half had their efficacy evaluated. In those evaluations, the endpoints were mostly related to reported behavior change and knowledge improvement, which is common for evaluations of health promotion programs. In the future, as more health apps are created, it is essential that apps that claim to have a public health objective undergo a rigorous evaluation of their acceptability, efficacy, and actual use. Indicators of outcomes beyond changes in behavior and knowledge should be reported; change in health status or access to care should also be reported. This systematic review has helped us note the characteristics associated with improved acceptability and efficacy, which can be helpful for the development of future apps.

Workplace violence against female healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ open · 2024

📚 28 citations🎯 RCR 15.30Top 1% NIH🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

Background Workplace violence (WPV) is highly prevalent in the health sector and remains a major occupational issue causing significant harm, ranging from bodily and psychological harm to death. Female healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of WPV. Objectives Identify risk factors of WPV among different professional categories of female HCWs. Data sources PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science, along with their references lists January 2010 and March 2022. Eligibility criteria English language observational studies focusing on WPV among HCWs evaluating the risk factors, impacts and consequences of WPV in female HCWs. Method Risk of bias was assessed for all studies by Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. We estimated the pooled prevalence of WPV and the associated 95% CI using a random-effects meta-analysis model. We then described the associated factors and effects of WPV. Results 28 reviewed studies (24 quantitative, 4 qualitative and 1 mixed-method) from 20 countries were selected. From the available results of 16 studies, the pooled prevalence of WPV was estimated at 45.0% (95% CI 32% to 58%). Types of violence included verbal abuse, verbal threats, physical assaults, sexual harassment, mobbing, bullying and discrimination. Perpetrators were patients, patients’ relatives, colleagues and supervisors. Nurses were the most studied HCWs category. WPV was found to affect both mental and physical health. Age, marital status, lower occupational position, substance abuse, shorter work experience and low support at work were the main socio-demographic and organisational factors associated with higher risk of WPV. Conclusion WPV prevalence is high among female HCWs, warranting a multilevel intervention approach to address and mitigate its impact. This approach should include targeted policies and individual-level strategies to create a safer work environment and prevent adverse effects on both HCWs and the broader healthcare system. Further research is needed to better document WPV in categories of HCWs other than nurses. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022329574.

Cookies & analyse de trafic

M MARTIN DURACINSKY

Pourquoi vous devez consulter ce praticien

Activité de recherche & publications

Publications académiques en France

Lieu de consultation

Tarifs & secteur de conventionnement

Prendre rendez-vous & contact

Top publications · les plus citées

Publications scientifiques (34) — classées par pathologie

Transversal12

Qualité de vie / PROMs11

Revue / méta-analyse4

Revue générale4

Essai clinique3

Santé mentale / fatigue3

Activité physique / Rééducation1

Économie santé1

Datasets & protocoles partagés

Partager cette fiche