📇 Rhumatologue · ST ETIENNE · (42) · Hospitalier
Chargement de la fiche…
Chargement de la fiche…
MonRhumato.fr utilise des cookies pour mesurer l'audience (statistiques) et améliorer le site. Aucune donnée de santé identifiable n'est jamais collectée. Politique de confidentialité.
Votre choix est conservé 13 mois (durée max CNIL). Vous pouvez le modifier à tout moment via Préférences cookies.
2 raisons identifiées
En plein centre-ville
ST ETIENNE (42000) — accessible depuis tout le bassin urbain
Délais de RDV courts dans la région
126.2 rhumatos / 100 000 hab. — département bien doté
✨ Génération du profil synthétique IA en cours…
Indicateurs publics agrégés sur 250 M+ d'œuvres scientifiques (OpenAlex, PubMed). Traduits ici en langage patient.
Influence scientifique
Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.
3
3 articles ont été cités au moins 3fois par d'autres chercheurs — preuve que ses travaux sont repris par la communauté médicale.
h-index
Total citations reçues
73
Nombre de fois où d'autres équipes ont mentionné ses publications dans leurs propres travaux.
Publications totales
9
Articles, revues et chapitres référencés dans les bases académiques internationales.
Articles influents
3
Publications ayant marqué leur domaine — chacune citée au moins 10 fois par d'autres chercheurs.
i10-index
Thématiques principales
Affiliations FR : Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne
Source : OpenAlex (CC0, OurResearch). Indicateurs académiques agrégés sur 250 M+ d'œuvres.
Articles déposés en accès libre sur l'archive ouverte des universités françaises (HAL) — gage d'activité de recherche en France.
Source : HAL — archive ouverte CCSD/CNRS (couvre articles, chapitres EMC, communications congrès, thèses).
HOPITAL DE BELLEVUE - CHU42
25 BD PASTEUR, 42000 ST ETIENNE
Secteur de conventionnement non disponible (médecin hospitalier ou non présent dans l'Annuaire santé CNAM des libéraux conventionnés).
Lien Doctolib = recherche Google site:doctolib.fr (le 1er résultat est presque toujours le profil correct s'il existe).
Neurourology and urodynamics · 2003
AbstractAimsTo record reflex motor responses, elicited by mechanical stimulation of the penis or clitoris, in each bulbocavernosus muscles and to compare left and right reflex pathways in normal subjects, then to compare electrical and mechanical responses in various neurological diseases.MethodsTwo groups of patients were studied: 22 patients without neurological disease considered as normal subjects; and 25 patients with neurological disease (three multiple sclerosis, six spina bifida, nine conus medullaris syndrome, three peripheral neuropathies, two lumbosacral lesions, one multisystem atrophy, and one syringomyelia). Electrical bulbocavernosus reflex (EBCR) was evoked by orthodromic stimulation of the dorsal nerve of the penis at the penile base or the clitoris. Mechanical bulbocavernosus reflex (MBCR) was elicited with an electromechanical hammer, tapping directly on the clitoris zone or on the ventral part of glans penis. For EBCR and MBCR, bulbocavernosus muscle contractions were successively recorded in the left and in the right side with a needle inserted under visual guidance.ResultsMean left mechanical latency was 31.7 msec (SD = 4.5) and right one 31.6 msec (SD = 3.8). The reproducibility of the responses was excellent (P < 0.0001). ). The mean difference between left and right latencies was 2 msec (SD = 1.2). In the neurological group, 22 EBCR (six right, nine left, seven bilateral) and 19 MBCR (eight right, nine left, two bilateral) were considered abnormal. The mean reflex latencies in patients with neurological lesions (lower motor neuron lesions) were statistically longer (P < 0.0001) than in normal subjects. Exact concordance (side of lesion) between MBCR and EBCR was observed in 15/25 cases (60%), poor concordance (presence of a sacral reflex alteration) in 3/25 (12%) cases, and in 7/25 (28%) cases there was a significant difference between the two techniques.ConclusionsMBCR may provide a good alternative for electrical stimulation and can be used to evaluate urinary disorders when a neurological etiology is suspected. However, the presence of false negatives with MBCR suggest that it may be more useful as a screening test. Neurourol. Urodynam. 22:676–680, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Neurourology and urodynamics · 2002
AbstractOur objective was to describe pelvic floor responses with measurement of reflex latency after suprapubic mechanical stimulation. Twenty‐one patients without neurological disease were studied. They were 14 women and seven men. The mean age was 51 (SD = 14.2). Motor responses were recorded with a needle electrode inserted in the left bulbocavernosus muscle. Stimulation was delivered with an electromechanical hammer, tapping directly on the suprapubic area. A polyphasic muscular response was always easily elicited in all patients. The man latency was 67.5 milliseconds (SD = 14.7). The reproducibility between the first and second mechanical responses was good with no statistical difference (r=0.966;P = 0.0001). In three patients who underwent cystometry, no rise in detrusor pressure was observed during mechanical stimulation of the suprapubic area. Our study clearly demonstrates a suprapubic bulbocavernosus reflex (SBR). Tapping the suprapubic area is a strong stimulus, reflexively mediated, used in the management of neurogenic bladder to determine a bladder contraction. However, the reflex consisting of pelvic floor muscle contraction after suprapubic stimulation was not specifically studied in humans. Many arguments can be put forth for a polysynaptic reflex (polyphasic response, habituation and short latency of the reflex, mean latency in the habitual values of R2 responses after electrical stimulation of the dorsal nerve of the penis). We hypothesize that the true stimulus is the stimulation of the bladder wall tensoreceptors, the integration level of the SBR is the sacral segments and the efferent limb the pudendal nerve, and afferent pathways could be conducted by pelvic nerve fibers. Competition between a preponderant (or exaggerated) SBR and a bladder contraction after suprapubic tapping may constitute an equivalent of detrusor‐sphincter dyssynergia in some suprasacral bladders. Neurourol. Urodynam. 21:210–213, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Source PubMed · Recherche par auteur (homonymes possibles, vérifier l'affiliation).
Neurourology and urodynamics · 2003 · Clinical Trial
Amarenco G, Ismael SS, Bayle B, Kerdraon J
Neurourology and urodynamics · 2002 · Journal Article
Amarenco G, Bayle B, Ismael SS, Kerdraon J
Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2016 · Evaluation Study
Mietton C, Nuti C, Dohin B, Bayle B, et al.