Chargement de la fiche…
Chargement de la fiche…
MonRhumato.fr utilise des cookies pour mesurer l'audience (statistiques) et améliorer le site. Aucune donnée de santé identifiable n'est jamais collectée. Politique de confidentialité.
Votre choix est conservé 13 mois (durée max CNIL). Vous pouvez le modifier à tout moment via Préférences cookies.
5 raisons identifiées
Auteur de référence en rhumatologie
28 articles scientifiques publiés — un praticien à la pointe de la recherche
En plein centre-ville
PARIS (75002) — accessible depuis tout le bassin urbain
Référence presse grand public
Cité 1 fois dans les médias — pédagogie reconnue
Disponibilité géographique
6 lieux d'exercice — choisissez celui qui vous arrange
Délais de RDV courts dans la région
336.2 rhumatos / 100 000 hab. — département bien doté
✨ Génération du profil synthétique IA en cours…
Indicateurs publics agrégés sur 250 M+ d'œuvres scientifiques (OpenAlex, PubMed). Traduits ici en langage patient.
Influence scientifique
19
19 articles ont été cités au moins 19fois par d'autres chercheurs — preuve que ses travaux sont repris par la communauté médicale.
h-index
Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.
Total citations reçues
1 281
Nombre de fois où d'autres équipes ont mentionné ses publications dans leurs propres travaux.
Publications totales
81
Articles, revues et chapitres référencés dans les bases académiques internationales.
Articles influents
22
Publications ayant marqué leur domaine — chacune citée au moins 10 fois par d'autres chercheurs.
i10-index
Thématiques principales
Affiliations FR : Université Paris Cité · Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · Hôpital Fernand-Widal
Source : OpenAlex (CC0, OurResearch). Indicateurs académiques agrégés sur 250 M+ d'œuvres.
IRM BACHAUMONT
6 R BACHAUMONT, 75002 PARIS
IMAGERIE MEDICALE PARIS CENTRE
7 RUE BERGERE, 75009 PARIS
IMAGERIE MEDICALE PARIS CENTRE
CLINIQUE BLOMET 136 BIS RUE BLOMET, 75015 PARIS
SCANNER BACHAUMONT PARIS CENTRE
12 R BACHAUMONT, 75002 PARIS
CLINIQUE DE LA MUETTE
46-48 46 R NICOLO, 75116 PARIS
IMAGERIE MEDICALE PARIS CENTRE
CLINIQUE DROUOT 20 RUE LAFFITTE, 75009 PARIS
Secteur de conventionnement non disponible (médecin hospitalier ou non présent dans l'Annuaire santé CNAM des libéraux conventionnés).
Lien Doctolib = recherche Google site:doctolib.fr (le 1er résultat est presque toujours le profil correct s'il existe).
Source : Google News (recherche par nom complet — homonymes possibles, vérifier le contenu).
📰 parismatch.com · 20/03/2017
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiogFBVV95cUxNUjdnZzctNTFETktCVDV2TjAwdHZkUHBVVXp2ZDhFSkxubk42LXVaWGRIXzRWc2FzR1h4VHFiZnk2YWloTnIybV9lWWdzY3RzTS1FcGl0YVlQRExPcmYyeW5fNy1mb0daMkRkcHg3Zi04UlJTN1FGZHNENWRfcmJpZU15TW1MTHhGcldrb0RJbTNlLVFKRnltcHBHemRvZFk3cnc?oc=5" target="_blank">Opératio
The American journal of sports medicine · 2007
Background Increasing the rate of watertight tendon healing has been suggested as an important criterion for optimizing clinical results in rotator cuff arthroscopic repair. Hypothesis A double-row anchorage technique for rotator cuff repair will produce better clinical results and a better rate of tendon healing than a single-row technique. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods We compared 31 patients undergoing surgery with a double-row anchorage technique using Panalok anchors and Cuff Tack anchors and 35 patients with rotator cuff tear undergoing surgery with a single-row anchorage arthroscopic technique using Panalok anchors. We compared pre- and postoperative Constant score and tendon healing, as evaluated by computed tomographic arthrography 6 months after surgery, in these 2 groups. Results The Constant score increased significantly in both groups, with no difference between the 2 groups (P = .4). Rotator cuff healing was judged anatomic in 19 patients with double-row anchorage and in 14 patients with single-row anchorage; this difference between the groups was significant (P = .03). Conclusion In this first study comparing double- and single-row anchorage techniques, we found no significant difference in clinical results, but tendon healing rates were better with the double-row anchorage. Improvements in the double-row technique might lead to better clinical and tendon healing results.
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2010
Purpose The aim of this study was to assess tendon healing and clinical results of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) repaired arthroscopically in patients aged 65 years or older. Methods Between January 2001 and December 2004, 88 patients with a mean age of 70 years (range, 65 to 85 years) had arthroscopic RCT repair. The repair was performed on 54 women (61%). The dominant arm was involved in 72 patients (82%). RCT included more than 2 tendons in 45 cases. Functional outcomes were assessed by use of the Constant score and Simple Shoulder Test. Tendon healing was estimated by use of a computed tomography (CT) arthrogram, which was obtained 6 months postoperatively, and was classified into 3 categories: stage 1, watertight and anatomic healing; stage 2, watertight and partial healing; and stage 3, not watertight and retear. Results The mean duration of follow‐up was 41 months (range, 24 to 77 months). The mean clinical outcome scores all improved significantly at the time of the final follow‐up ( P < .01). Computed tomography arthrogram imaging showed 27 shoulders with a stage 1 repair, 20 with a stage 2 repair, and 34 with a stage 3 repair. The retear rate was 42% (34 of 81). The patients with tendon healing stage 1 or 2 had a significantly superior functional outcome in terms of overall scores and strength compared with the stage 3 repairs ( P < .01). In our study we had 39 isolated supraspinatus tears (small or medium tears); 11 (28.9%) had a retear (stage 3). Conclusions Arthroscopic repair in patients aged 65 years or older can yield tendon healing resulting in significant functional improvement. Our data suggest that arthroscopic repair can be considered successful for the older patient specifically when the tear is limited to the supraspinatus tendon. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2008
Purpose We investigated how soon postoperative functional recovery became significant after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and the influence of tendon healing. Methods We conducted a prospective study on 114 cases of full‐thickness rotator cuff tears arthroscopically repaired from January 2001 to December 2003. All patients were evaluated by the Constant scoring system at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery and at last follow‐up. Computed tomography arthrography was done at 6 months postoperatively to study the progression of tendon healing. Results The Constant score significantly improved from the third month after surgery ( P < .0001) until the twelfth month, after which it stabilized ( P < .0001). At last follow‐up (31 months), the mean score was 80.1 points (range, 50 to 95 points). Female sex ( P < .0001), upper‐limb heavy work ( P < .0001), poor bone quality ( P = .039), and absence of healing ( P = .002) were negative predictive factors. In particular, the absence of tendon healing leads to a worsening of the results from the twelfth month onward. Conclusions Arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff lesions as performed in this study gives very good results in terms of functional recovery. Our study showed functional recovery as early as 3 months after surgery and further improvement over the first year, followed by stabilization. We found that female sex, upper‐limb heavy work, poor bone quality, and lack of tendon healing were all negatively associated with outcome. Patients presenting with a retear differed from the other patients, in that their clinical progression showed a significant rise in the Constant score over the first year, with a lowering of the score thereafter. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Source PubMed · Recherche par auteur (homonymes possibles, vérifier l'affiliation).
World journal of nuclear medicine · 2023 · Journal Article
Franceschi AM, Petrover DR, Giliberto L, Clouston SAP, et al.
Acta orthopaedica Belgica · 2022 · Journal Article
Ferenczi A, Petrover D, Nectoux R, Orcel P, et al.
Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2018 · Journal Article
Ferenczi A, Ostertag A, Lasbleiz S, Petrover D, et al.
European radiology · 2017 · Journal Article
Petrover D, Bellity J, Vigan M, Nizard R, et al.
Medicine · 2017 · Journal Article
Richaud C, De Lastours V, Panhard X, Petrover D, et al.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2017 · Journal Article
Hakime A, Yevich S, Tselikas L, Deschamps F, et al.
European radiology · 2015 · Journal Article
Fedida B, Touraine S, Stirnemann J, Belmatoug N, et al.
Skeletal radiology · 2013 · Case Reports
Touraine S, Lagadec M, Petrover D, Genah I, et al.
The Journal of rheumatology · 2012 · Case Reports
Bailly F, Petrover D, Allez M, Richette P
Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 2009 · Journal Article
Petrover D, Belmatoug N
Journal of psychosomatic research · 2023 · Journal Article
Jacob L, Petrover D, Koyanagi A, Haro JM, et al.
Skeletal radiology · 2019 · Comparative Study
Dekimpe C, Andreani O, Camuzard O, Raffaelli C, et al.
Seminars in interventional radiology · 2018 · Journal Article
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026 · Journal Article
Logiou C, Ostertag A, Vergnol JF, Richette P, et al.
Joint bone spine · 2025 · Journal Article
Jacob L, Heslot C, Ribau M, Logiou C, et al.
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025 · Published Erratum
Jacob L, Clouzeau A, Ostertag A, Petrover D, et al.
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025 · Journal Article
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2024 · Journal Article
Keir G, Petrover D, Caravella C, Goenka A, et al.
Clinical imaging · 2022 · Journal Article
Franceschi AM, Petrover DR, McMahon TM, Libman RB, et al.
Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR · 2022 · Journal Article
Catonné Y, Amzallag J, Wajsfisz A, Brasseur JL, et al.
Source : DataCite — DOIs pour datasets, logiciels, protocoles, registres patient. Hors articles (déjà couverts).
Petrover D, Hakime A, Silvera J, Richette P, et al.
Joint bone spine · 2018 · Journal Article
Petrover D, Richette P
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2017 · Journal Article
Petrover D, Silvera J, De Baere T, Vigan M, et al.
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2010 · Journal Article
Charousset C, Bellaïche L, Kalra K, Petrover D
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2008 · Journal Article
Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD, Bellaïche L, et al.
The American journal of sports medicine · 2007 · Evaluation Study
Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD, Bellaiche L, et al.
Jacob L, Clouzeau A, Ostertag A, Petrover D, et al.
Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique · 2023 · Journal Article
James-Belin E, Ostertag A, Couzi E, Petrover D, et al.
La Revue du praticien · 2008 · English Abstract
Bellaïche L, Petrover D
European radiology · 2010 · Case Reports
Wybier M, Gaudart S, Petrover D, Houdart E, et al.