📇 Rhumatologue · PARIS · (75) · Libéral
Chargement de la fiche…
Chargement de la fiche…
MonRhumato.fr utilise des cookies pour mesurer l'audience (statistiques) et améliorer le site. Aucune donnée de santé identifiable n'est jamais collectée. Politique de confidentialité.
Votre choix est conservé 13 mois (durée max CNIL). Vous pouvez le modifier à tout moment via Préférences cookies.
2 raisons identifiées
Praticien-chercheur
13 articles scientifiques publiés — formation continue solide
Délais de RDV courts dans la région
336.2 rhumatos / 100 000 hab. — département bien doté
✨ Génération du profil synthétique IA en cours…
CABINET DU DR GENEVIEVE LAPORTE
13 RUE DE CLICHY, 75009 PARIS
Secteur de conventionnement non disponible (médecin hospitalier ou non présent dans l'Annuaire santé CNAM des libéraux conventionnés).
Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.
Lien Doctolib = recherche Google site:doctolib.fr (le 1er résultat est presque toujours le profil correct s'il existe).
BMJ open · 2022
Introduction Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infant are still a contemporary concern. To counter the detrimental effects resulting from the hospitalisation in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), developmental care (DC) interventions have emerged as a philosophy of care aimed at protecting and enhancing preterm infant’s development and promoting parental outcomes. In the past two decades, many authors have suggested DC models, core measures, practice guidelines and standards of care but outlined different groupings of interventions rather than specific interventions that can be used in NICU clinical practice. Moreover, as these DC interventions are mostly implemented by neonatal nurses, it would be strategic and valuable to identify specific outcome indicators to make visible the contribution of NICU nurses to DC. Objectives The overarching objective of this review is to identify the nature, range, and extent of the literature regarding DC nursing interventions for preterm infants in the NICU. The secondary twofold objectives are to highlight interventions that fall into identified categories of DC interventions and suggest nursing-sensitive outcome indicators related to DC interventions in the NICU. Inclusion criteria Papers reporting on or discussing a DC nursing intervention during NICU hospitalisation will be included. Methods and analysis The Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodology for scoping reviews will be followed. CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest and PsycInfo databases from 2009 to the present will be searched. Any type of paper, published in English or French, will be considered. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by pairs of two review authors independently. A qualitative content analysis will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination No Institutional Review Board ethical approbation is needed. Results of this review will be presented in scientific meetings and published in refereed papers.
Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN · 2022
AbstractPurposeTo translate and conduct the preliminary psychometric validation of a skin‐to‐skin contact instrument in French (SSC‐F) with a sample of nurses from Quebec and France working in neonatal intensive care units.MethodsThe 20 items of the SSC instrument containing four subscales (knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, training and education and implementation), developed by Vittner et al. (2017), was translated into French. The methodological steps used for psychometric validation included assessment of the item and subscale normality distributions, assessment of reliability using internal consistency, and assessment of validity using inter‐item and inter‐scale correlations and principal component analysis.ResultsThe preliminary psychometric validation showed that all four subscales of the French version had adequate internal consistency (0.61–0.77), supporting the calculation of a total score for each subscale based on the English version of the instrument. The structural validity was supported by principal component analysis findings.Practice ImplicationsBased on the findings of the preliminary psychometric validation of our study, the SSC‐F instrument could be used in research with French‐speaking neonatal nurses in Western countries, but gathering more evidence about its reliability and validity is warranted for clinical practice.
Source PubMed · Recherche par auteur (homonymes possibles, vérifier l'affiliation).
Bordeaux medical · 1972 · Journal Article
Laporte G
Revue du rhumatisme et des maladies osteo-articulaires · 1971 · Journal Article
David-Chaussé J, David-Chaussé F, Picot C, Laporte G, et al.
Bordeaux medical · 1970 · Journal Article
David-Chaussé J, Laporte G
Rhumatologie · 1969 · Journal Article
Laporte G
Revue du rhumatisme et des maladies osteo-articulaires · 1968 · Journal Article
David-Chaussé J, Laporte G
Digital health · 2025 · Journal Article
Moussa S, Drake EK, Castiglione SA, Laporte G, et al.
JBI evidence synthesis · 2022 · Journal Article
Laporte G, De Clifford-Faugère G, Aita M
BMJ open · 2022 · Journal Article
Héon M, Aita M, Lavallée A, De Clifford-Faugère G, et al.
Rhumatologie · 1967 · Journal Article
David-Chausse J, David-Chausse F, Lagoarde J, Picot C, et al.
Journal de medecine de Bordeaux et du Sud-Ouest · 1966 · Journal Article
David-Chaussé J, Laporte G
Pediatric investigation · 2024 · Journal Article
Aita M, De Clifford-Faugère G, Laporte G, Colson S, et al.
Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN · 2022 · Journal Article
Aita M, De Clifford Faugère G, Laporte G, Colson S, et al.
JBI evidence synthesis · 2022 · Journal Article
Laporte G, De Clifford-Faugère G, Aita M
JBI evidence synthesis · 2021 · Journal Article
De Clifford-Faugère G, Lavallée A, Rioux É, Laporte G, et al.
JBI evidence synthesis · 2021 · Journal Article
De Clifford-Faugère G, Lavallée A, Rioux É, Laporte G, et al.