📇 Rhumatologue · PARIS CEDEX 13 · (75) · Hospitalier

M ANDREAS HARTMANN

Pourquoi vous devez consulter ce praticien

3 raisons identifiées

Plateau technique de référence
Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) — équipements et expertise pointus pour les cas complexes
Auteur de référence en rhumatologie
40 articles scientifiques publiés — un praticien à la pointe de la recherche
Délais de RDV courts dans la région
336.2 rhumatos / 100 000 hab. — département bien doté

Rhumatologue

📍 PARIS CEDEX 13 (75)HospitalierRPPS 10001551836

📊 Reconnaissance scientifique : 77/100📝 497 articles publiés🇫🇷 Publications académiques françaises (8)

✨ Génération du profil synthétique IA en cours…

Activité de recherche & publications

Indicateurs publics agrégés sur 250 M+ d'œuvres scientifiques (OpenAlex, PubMed). Traduits ici en langage patient.

Influence scientifique

Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.

Top publications · les plus citées

European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders-version 2.0. Part III: pharmacological treatment

European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2022

📚 119 citations🎯 RCR 15.35Top 1% NIH🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

AbstractIn 2011, the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome (ESSTS) published the first European guidelines for Tourette Syndrome (TS). We now present an update of the part on pharmacological treatment, based on a review of new literature with special attention to other evidence-based guidelines, meta-analyses, and randomized double-blinded studies. Moreover, our revision took into consideration results of a recent survey on treatment preferences conducted among ESSTS experts. The first preference should be given to psychoeducation and to behavioral approaches, as it strengthens the patients’ self-regulatory control and thus his/her autonomy. Because behavioral approaches are not effective, available, or feasible in all patients, in a substantial number of patients pharmacological treatment is indicated, alone or in combination with behavioral therapy. The largest amount of evidence supports the use of dopamine blocking agents, preferably aripiprazole because of a more favorable profile of adverse events than first- and second-generation antipsychotics. Other agents that can be considered include tiapride, risperidone, and especially in case of co-existing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), clonidine and guanfacine. This view is supported by the results of our survey on medication preference among members of ESSTS, in which aripiprazole was indicated as the drug of first choice both in children and adults. In treatment resistant cases, treatment with agents with either a limited evidence base or risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects might be considered, including pimozide, haloperidol, topiramate, cannabis-based agents, and botulinum toxin injections. Overall, treatment of TS should be individualized, and decisions based on the patient’s needs and preferences, presence of co-existing conditions, latest scientific findings as well as on the physician’s preferences, experience, and local regulatory requirements.

European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders-version 2.0. Part II: psychological interventions

European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2022

📚 102 citations🎯 RCR 14.04Top 1% NIH🩺 Clinique🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

AbstractPart II of the European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders (ECAP journal, 2011) provides updated information and recommendations for psychological interventions for individuals with tic disorders, created by a working group of the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome (ESSTS). A systematic literature search was conducted to obtain original studies of psychological interventions for tic disorders, published since the initial European clinical guidelines were issued. Relevant studies were identified using computerized searches of the MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases for the years 2011–2019 and a manual search for the years 2019–2021. Based on clinical consensus, psychoeducation is recommended as an initial intervention regardless of symptom severity. According to a systematic literature search, most evidence was found for Habit Reversal Training (HRT), primarily the expanded package Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT). Evidence was also found for Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP), but to a lesser degree of certainty than HRT/CBIT due to fewer studies. Currently, cognitive interventions and third-wave interventions are not recommended as stand-alone treatments for tic disorders. Several novel treatment delivery formats are currently being evaluated, of which videoconference delivery of HRT/CBIT has the most evidence to date. To summarize, when psychoeducation alone is insufficient, both HRT/CBIT and ERP are recommended as first-line interventions for tic disorders. As part of the development of the clinical guidelines, a survey is reported from ESSTS members and other tic disorder experts on preference, use and availability of psychological interventions for tic disorders.

European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders-version 2.0. Part I: assessment

European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2022

📚 74 citations🎯 RCR 10.21Top 2% NIH🔓 Open Access📄 PDF gratuit ↗

Lire l'abstract Crossref ↓

AbstractIn 2011 a working group of the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome (ESSTS) has developed the first European assessment guidelines for Tourette syndrome (TS). Now, we present an updated version 2.0 of these European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders, part I: assessment. Therefore, the available literature has been thoroughly screened, supplemented with national guidelines across countries and discussions among ESSTS experts. Diagnostic changes between DSM-IV and DSM-5 classifications were taken into account and new information has been added regarding differential diagnoses, with an emphasis on functional movement disorders in both children and adults. Further, recommendations regarding rating scales to evaluate tics, comorbidities, and neuropsychological status are provided. Finally, results from a recently performed survey among ESSTS members on assessment in TS are described. We acknowledge that the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) is still the gold standard for assessing tics. Recommendations are provided for scales for the assessment of tics and psychiatric comorbidities in patients with TS not only in routine clinical practice, but also in the context of clinical research. Furthermore, assessments supporting the differential diagnosis process are given as well as tests to analyse cognitive abilities, emotional functions and motor skills.

Cookies & analyse de trafic

M ANDREAS HARTMANN

Pourquoi vous devez consulter ce praticien

Activité de recherche & publications

Publications académiques en France

Lieu de consultation

Tarifs & secteur de conventionnement

Prendre rendez-vous & contact

Top publications · les plus citées

Publications scientifiques (40) — classées par pathologie

Transversal12

Pédiatrie9

Essai clinique4

Qualité de vie / PROMs4

Microbiote3

Pharmacovigilance3

Épidémiologie & registres2

Biomarqueurs / Auto-Ac1

Case report / série1

Génétique1

Recommandations1

Revue / méta-analyse1

Revue générale1

Datasets & protocoles partagés

Partager cette fiche