Chargement de la fiche…
Chargement de la fiche…
MonRhumato.fr utilise des cookies pour mesurer l'audience (statistiques) et améliorer le site. Aucune donnée de santé identifiable n'est jamais collectée. Politique de confidentialité.
Votre choix est conservé 13 mois (durée max CNIL). Vous pouvez le modifier à tout moment via Préférences cookies.
✨ Génération du profil synthétique IA en cours…
Secteur de conventionnement non disponible (médecin hospitalier ou non présent dans l'Annuaire santé CNAM des libéraux conventionnés).
Lien Doctolib = recherche Google site:doctolib.fr (le 1er résultat est presque toujours le profil correct s'il existe).
Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2006
Objectives.Surveillance of surgical site infections (SSIs) is effective in reducing the rates of these complications, but it is extremely time-consuming and, consequently, underused. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of a computer-assisted surveillance system, compared with a conventional method involving review of medical records, and the time saved with the computer-assisted system.Method.A prospective study was conducted from January 1 to December 31, 2001. With the computer-assisted method, screening for SSIs relied on identification in the laboratory database of positive results of microbiological tests of surgical-site specimens; confirmation was obtained via computer-generated questionnaires completed by the surgeon in charge of the patient. In the conventional method, SSIs were identified by exhaustive chart review. The time spent on surveillance was recorded for both methods.Setting.A 25-bed gastrointestinal surgery unit in a tertiary care hospital.Patients.A total of 766 consecutive patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery.Results.The sensitivity of the computer-assisted method was 84.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.94); the specificity was 99.9%. For the 807 surgical procedures in the study, 197 had an SSI identified by culture of a surgical-site specimen. After elimination of 63 duplicate cultures with positive results, 134 questionnaires were sent to the surgeons, who confirmed 27 SSIs. The conventional method identified 32 SSIs. The computer-assisted method required 60% less time than the conventional method (90 hours vs 223 hours).Conclusion.Surveillance for SSIs using computer-assisted, laboratory-based screening and case confirmation by surgeons is as efficient as and far less time-consuming than the conventional method of chart review. This method permits routine surveillance for SSIs with reliable accuracy.
Source PubMed · Recherche par auteur (homonymes possibles, vérifier l'affiliation).
Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2006 · Journal Article
Chalfine A, Cauet D, Lin WC, Gonot J, et al.
ICU performance as assessed using the three SAPS II models
<b>Copyright information:</b>Taken from "Mortality prediction using SAPS II: an update for French intensive care units"Critical Care 2005;9(6):R645-R652.Published online 6 Oct 2005PMCID:PMC1414016.Copyright © 2005 Le Gal
ICU performance as assessed using the three SAPS II models
<b>Copyright information:</b>Taken from "Mortality prediction using SAPS II: an update for French intensive care units"Critical Care 2005;9(6):R645-R652.Published online 6 Oct 2005PMCID:PMC1414016.Copyright © 2005 Le Gal
Source : DataCite — DOIs pour datasets, logiciels, protocoles, registres patient. Hors articles (déjà couverts).
Données ANS publiques (Licence Ouverte 2.0) · Enrichissements MonRhumato 100 % opt-in · Toute personne référencée peut demander la suppression ou la rectification.